On this page
Global monoisopropylamine output in 2026 is estimated at approximately 200,000 to 300,000 tonnes, reflecting its role as a specialty aliphatic amine rather than a high-volume commodity. Output direction is shaped by propylene availability, ammonia supply, process yields, and demand from agrochemical and pharmaceutical intermediates.
Production capacity is moderately concentrated among producers with integrated petrochemical and amine-processing capability. Asia Pacific accounts for the largest share of volume output due to agrochemical manufacturing and chemical intermediate production. Europe and North America maintain stable capacity focused on higher-purity and regulated applications. Capacity expansion is selective, driven mainly by downstream synthesis requirements rather than standalone volume growth.
Usage remains synthesis-driven. Buyers prioritise purity, consistent reactivity, and secure delivery over spot availability.
Technical-grade material accounts for the majority of volume, while high-purity grades command premiums due to additional distillation and analytical control.
Process choice affects selectivity, yield, and purity. Buyers favour producers with robust separation capability and consistent batch quality.
Agrochemical and pharmaceutical intermediates account for the largest share of value usage, while rubber and industrial applications absorb steady volumes.
Asia Pacific leads global output supported by integrated petrochemical supply and agrochemical manufacturing.
China accounts for a significant share of volume, supplying domestic and export-oriented chemical intermediates.
Europe maintains limited but high-compliance capacity focused on pharmaceutical and specialty uses.
North America supports stable production aligned with regulated chemical synthesis and industrial demand.
Other regions rely largely on imports due to limited amine production infrastructure.
The monoisopropylamine value chain begins with propylene and ammonia supply, followed by amination, purification, packaging, and controlled distribution. Major cost drivers include feedstock pricing, hydrogen and energy use, separation efficiency, compliance costs, and logistics.
Supply movement reflects qualification requirements. High-purity grades typically move under long-term agreements, while technical grades support regional industrial consumption.
The monoisopropylamine ecosystem includes petrochemical producers, amine manufacturers, agrochemical companies, pharmaceutical firms, rubber chemical producers, distributors, and regulators. Long-term positioning depends on feedstock security, process efficiency, and alignment with downstream synthesis pipelines.
Strategic considerations include investment in higher-selectivity processes, expansion of high-purity capacity, diversification across end uses, and preparation for evolving chemical safety standards.
Global output in 2026 is estimated at approximately 200,000-300,000 tonnes.
It serves as a selective intermediate in synthesis routes and requires controlled production to limit secondary amines.
Pharmaceutical intermediates and fine chemical synthesis require the highest purity and lowest moisture content.
Monoisopropylamine offers higher reactivity and selectivity, while diisopropylamine is bulkier and used differently in synthesis.
Buyers rely on approved suppliers, controlled storage, long-term agreements, and regulatory documentation.
Explore Hydrocarbons, Petrochemicals, and Organic Chemicals Insights
View Reports
Monoisopropylamine Global Production Capacity and Growth Outlook
Thank you!
You will receive an email from our Business Development Manager. Please be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folder too.
